ࡱ > y 5 bjbj 0 { { - < < 8 b t , h Y, [, [, [, [, [, [, $ B/ 1 , , , v Y, Y, r I* T %+ CHf* j * E, , 0 , * z 2 g 2 %+ %+ 2 9+ , , , 2 < X : Template 1-pager for CCM and CTM groups participating in the community wide IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations
The following questions are all with respect to the version of your model you anticipate running for the planned IGAC/SPARC community simulations in PHASE 1 (i.e., near-term, next 3 years). These simulations are carried out in support of the 2014 WMO/UNEP Ozone Assessment and the IGAC / SPARC Hindcast activity. They are defined for CCMs and CTMs with interactive stratospheric and/or tropospheric chemistry (preferably both) and with or without interactive ocean (preferably interactive). Some of the simulations are very similar to simulations defined in CMIP5 or the SPARC Lifetime Assessment. If you have already done these simulations, please also indicate this in the questionnaire.
Please return the filled document to HYPERLINK "mailto:Veronika.Eyring@dlr.de" Veronika.Eyring@dlr.de, HYPERLINK "mailto:lamar@ucar.edu" lamar@ucar.edu and HYPERLINK "mailto:peter.hess@cornell.edu" peter.hess@cornell.edu if possible by May 16, 2012. A summary of the answers will be presented at the Davos workshop.
1. Provide details of anticipated model configuration and the simulations your group is planning to run.
Model NameInteractive stratospheric chemistry?YES/NO
(if yes, reference for chemistry scheme)GroupInteractive tropospheric chemistry?YES/NO
(if yes, reference for chemistry scheme)InvestigatorsInteractive aerosols?YES/NO
(if yes, reference for aerosol scheme)Type: CCM, ESM, and/or CTMOrographic Gravity Wave Drag (O-GWD)Underlying General Circulation Model (GCM)Non O-GWDHoriz. Resolution Atmosphere Vertical resolution in the tropopause region in mCoupled to Ocean (horizontal resolution)?YES/NO
(if yes, reference for ocean model)Stratospheric gas phase chemistryNo. Levels/ Upper Boundary in hPaSolid PSCs and liquid aerosolsRadiative FeedbacksDenitrification / DehydrationInteractive Biosphere?NMHCsAdvection SchemeReference
Which simulations (as defined in the draft simulations document) are you planning to run? Please prioritize the simulations.REF-C1YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2-RCP2.6
Link to CMIP5YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?REF-C2 (RCP 4.5)
Link to CMIP5YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2- RCP8.5
Link to CMIP5YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?REF-C3YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2- RCP6.0
Link to CMIP5
YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C1-Emis YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2-fODS
YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C3-EmisYES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2-fGHG
YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C1-fEmisYES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2-fEmis
YES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C3-fEmisYES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C2-GeoMIPYES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C1-fLCYES/NO/MAYBE
Priority?SCN-C2-VolYES/NO/MAYBE
Planned to be finished around when? Priority?SCN-C3-fLCYES/NO/MAYBE
Priority?
For the configuration described above:
2. Did you contribute simulations to the SPARC CCMVal report inter-comparison? If yes, what changes will be / have been made from that version? If problems were identified, what changes will you / have you made to address those problems?
3. Did you contribute simulations to the SPARC Lifetime Assessment? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
4. Did you contribute simulations to CMIP5? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
5. Did you contribute simulations to GeoMIP? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
6. Did you contribute simulations to ACCMIP? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
7. Did you contribute simulations to AeroCom? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
8. Did you contribute simulations to HTAP? If yes, which simulations? If yes, is the model you plan on using for additional IGAC-SPARC CCMVal simulations the same, slightly different, or significantly different?
9. What are the 3-5 highest priority science topics that your group is planning to work on?
10. References
FYI: Table 1 and 2 from the simulations document.
Table 1: Summary of proposed IGAC-SPARC CCMVal reference simulations.
ScenarioPeriodGreenhouse GasesODSsSSTs/SICsBackground & Volcanic AerosolSolar VariabilityVSLSQBOOzone and Aerosol PrecursorsREF-C1Transient simulation 1960-2010
Appropriate spin up prior to 1960OBS
GHG used for CMIP5 simulations, updated until 2010.OBS
ADDIN EN.CITE WMO2011141(WMO, 2011)14114117WMO(World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010Global Ozone Research and Monitoring ProjectReport516pp. Geneva, SwitzerlandNo. 522011( HYPERLINK \l "_ENREF_33" \o "WMO, 2011 #141" WMO, 2011)OBS
HadISST1
OBS
Surface Area Density data (SAD)
OBS
Spectrally resolved irradiance data
YESOBS or internally generatedOBS
Based on Lamarque et al. (2010), but annual emissionsREF-C2Transient simulation 1960-2100
10-year spin up prior to 1960RCP 4.5
ADDIN EN.CITE ADDIN EN.CITE.DATA ( HYPERLINK \l "_ENREF_30" \o "Thomson, 2011 #510" Thomson et al., 2011)OBS + A1 scenario from ADDIN EN.CITE WMO2011141WMO (2011)14114117WMO(World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010Global Ozone Research and Monitoring ProjectReport516pp. Geneva, SwitzerlandNo. 522011 HYPERLINK \l "_ENREF_33" \o "WMO, 2011 #141" WMO (2011)Modeled SSTsOBS Background SAD from 2000YES
Spectrally resolved irradiance dataYESOnly internally generatedSame as REF-C1 until 2005 + RCP 4.5 scenario in the futureREF-C3
(nudged for CCMs, or CTMs)Transient simulation 1980-2010
OBS
GHG used for CMIP5 simulations, updated until 2010. OBS
ADDIN EN.CITE WMO2011141(WMO, 2011)14114117WMO(World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010Global Ozone Research and Monitoring ProjectReport516pp. Geneva, SwitzerlandNo. 522011( HYPERLINK \l "_ENREF_33" \o "WMO, 2011 #141" WMO, 2011)OBS
Consistent with met. reanalysis
(ERA-Interim)OBS
Surface Area Density data (SAD)
OBS
Spectrally resolved irradiance data
YESOBS or internally generatedOBS
Based on Lamarque et al. (2010), but annual emissionsTable 2: Summary of proposed IGAC-SPARC CCMVal sensitivity simulations.
ScenarioPeriodGHGsODSsSSTs/SICsBackground & Volcanic AerosolSolar VariabilityVSLSQBOOzone and Aerosol PrecursorsSCN-C1-Emis 1960-2010Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Different from REF-C1SCN-C3-Emis1980 2010Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Different from REF-C3SCN-C1-fEmis1960-2010Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Fixed at 1960 levelsSCN-C3-fEmis1980-2010Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Fixed at 1980 levelsSCN-C1-fLC1960-2010Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1Same as in REF-C1OBS or internally generatedSame as in REF-C1, but non-changing land-coverSCN-C3-fLC1980-2010Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3Same as in REF-C3OBS or internally generatedSame as in REF-C3, but non-changing land-coverSCN-C2-RCP2.62000-2100
OBS +
RCP 2.6 Same as in REF-C2SSTs/SICs distribution consistent with RCP 2.6 GHG scenarioSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as REF-C1 until 2010 + scenario consistent with GHGsSCN-C2- RCP6.0
2000-2100
OBS +
RCP 6.0 Same as in REF-C2SSTs/SICs distribution consistent with RCP 6.0 GHG scenarioSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as REF-C1 until 2010 + scenario consistent with GHGsSCN-C2- RCP8.52000-2100
OBS +
RCP 8.5 Same as in REF-C2SSTs/SICs distribution consistent with RCP 8.5 GHG scenarioSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as REF-C1 until 2010 + scenario consistent with GHGsSCN-C2-fODS 1960-2100Same as in REF-C2Fixed halogens at 1960 levelSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2SCN-C2-fGHG 1960-2100Fixed GHG at 1960 levelsSame as in REF-C21955-1964 average of values used in REF-C2, repeating each yearSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2SCN-C2-fEmis
1960-2100Fixed ozone and aerosol precursorsSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Fixed at 1960 levelsSCN-C2-GeoMIP 2020-various4xCO2, 1%/year CO2 or RCP4.5Same as in REF-C2Modeled or specified SSTsSpecified by GeoMIP experimentSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2SCN-C2-Vol2020-2100Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Volcanic eruptions in the futureSame as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2Same as in REF-C2
May 5, 2012
! ' i j k ' J ] b ;
T
C D o p ɽɵɵɡɵɨ h06X h, 0J h, h, j h, Uh<