Falcon


The DLR FALCON Research Aircraft

Robert Baumann (DLR, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre)

The following document covers

1. AIRCRAFT DESCRIPTION

The Falcon 20-E is a modified twin engine-jet business aircraft with a wingspan of 16.3 m and a length (without noseboom) of 17.15 m. The maximum altitude is about 12000 m and the maximum endurance about 3 to 3.5 h (which now has been increased after an engine retrofit in the end of 1995). Typical research flight cruising speed is between 100 m/s at low levels and 180 m/s at 10000 m.

2. INSTRUMENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF MEASUREMENTS

The sensors for the standard meteorological parameters temperature, pressure, humidity and wind are permanently installed. The instrumentation for measurement of aircraft position and velocity is part of the aircraft's avionic equipment and permanetly available, too. The data of all sensors and the avionic equipment are sampled at rates of 10-100 Hz (depending on how fast the individual sensor is). The sensors are:

3. DATA EVALUATION

During data processing, the raw data of the sensors have been corrected from all known systematic errors resulting from the measurements taken on a relatively fast flying aircraft.

The temperature has been corrected from the near-adiabatic heating inside of the housing.

The measurements of the Lyman-Alpha and the Vaisala have been transformed to outer air conditions assuming constant mixing ratio during the pass through the measurement channel.

The drift and offset of the Lyman-alpha has been removed using a dynamic base-lining in periodic and small steps using the Vaisala data as a reference. The base-lining is performed by adjusting a fictive zero- humidity detector output voltage (which is part of the exponential relation between humidity and measured voltage) a little bit towards that value that would theoretically fit the Lyman-alpha and the reference data. The adjustment is re-calculated every 5 seconds but only 5% of the needed correction for a perfect match between Lyman-Alpha and reference is added per cycle. By this, no significant artificial steps in the data occur (after the initial swing-in phase) and the high frequency response of the Lyman-Alpha is not too much damped by the slow Vaisala. On the other hand a reasonable fast coupling (effective time constant about 100 s) to the long term stability of the Vaisala remains. This is superior to a simple constant shift of the finally calculated absolute humididity, as the later one would not respect the exponential relation between sensor output and humidity. Synchronous to the baselining, the contribution of the absorption by oxygen, which grows to a dominant factor at high altitudes, has been taken into account.

The measured static and impact pressure have been corrected from the positional error of pressure measurements at the nose-boom and the true airspeed calculation also takes into account the humidity of the air.

The horizontal velocity components of the IRS have been corrected by use of the FMC position data as a reference (Flight Management Computer, part of the aircraft's avionic system, see Baumann et al.(1990)) position data as a reference. The time-series of the position difference between the two sources have been fitted to an error model of typical IRS-errors and the time derivation of this position error has been substracted from the velocity components (Quante et al. 1995). By this, the error has been reduced by a factor of 3-5 to probably less than 0.5 m/s for each component.

On principal the vertical velocity and altitude cannot be determined directly with any IRS without an additional independent measurement of the altitude, because of the instability of the navigation equations in the vertical coordinate. On-line the auxiliary altitude comes from a standard atmosphere barometric height calculation. For off-line data evaluation altitude has been calculated more accurately by integration of the hydrostatic equation

dH = - dp / (g * rho)

where dp is the change of static pressure from one time step to the next, g is the local gravity and rho is the actual mass density of the air. This height (called 'true height' in contrast to 'standard atmosphere pressure height') also has been included in the provided dataset.

The data in this dataset have been averaged to 1 second means, but most of the turbulence related parameters (wind components, Lyman-Alpha data and fast Pt-100 Sensor) could also be processed with full 100 Hz sampling resolution on demand.

Further informations on algorithms, calibration procedures and definitions of parameters are given in Bögel and Baumann (1991), Baumann (1994) and Meischner (1985).

4. ACCURACY

parameter units absolute accuracy(1)
static temperature °C 0.5
abs. Hum. (Lyman-alpha) g/m3 0.5 (2)
rel. Hum. (Vaisala) % 8 (@8km)/12 (@10km)(3)
pressure hPa 1.0
horizontal wind m/s 1.0 (4)
vertical wind m/s 0.5

Notes:

(1) relative accuracy, i.e. dynamic variation of the current error during short periods of time (some minutes) would be much lower (typically by one order of magnitude), but this number depends on the stability of mean temperature, mean height, and the duration of the time period considered.

(2) For ascending/descending aircraft. During straight level flight the absolute accuracy is as good as for the Vaisala (i.e. the value in g/m3 is much smaller at high altitudes) plus an additional uncertainty of ±5% of the maximal amplitude of fluctuations.

(3) Strongly depends on height, e.g. near ground accuracy is as good as 2% r.h.

(4) Estimated (preliminary) accuracy with the correction by use of FMC-Positions.

A overview of intercomparison publications is given in Fimpel (1991). Recent intercomparison results are given e.g. in Quante et al. (1993), Quante et al. (1995) and Ström et al. (1994).

5. QUALITY AND FAILURES ON 21.07.92

The dewpoint mirror was not reliable for this flight due to cooling problems inside of the aircraft's nose compartment, where the sensor was installed, i.e. the mirror cooling could not reach an equilibrium state at the operation temperatures. The DP-Mirror data therefore has been excluded from distribution.

Between 16:46:40 and 16:59:00 the Lyman-Alpha data missed a reasonable correspondence to the Vaisala signal (the signal partially felt below zero humidity) and therefore has been marked as invalid for this period in the distributed dataset (replaced by value '99.999')

6. REFERENCES

Baumann, R., H.G. Christner, H.P. Fimpel and G. Wilke, 1990: The Improvement of the Installation of the DLR Research Aircraft Falcon: Description and First Results. in: International Workshop on the Airborne Measurements of Wind, Turbulence and Position (Workshop Report). DLR-Mitteilung 90-13, 47-50.

Baumann, R., 1994: Calculation Scheme for Wind- and Turbulence Data of the DLR Research Aircraft. DLR-Institutsbericht IB 553-1/94. 16 pp.

Bögel, W. and R. Baumann, 1991: Test and Calibration of the DLR Falcon Wind Measuring System by Maneuvers, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 8, 5-18.

Busen, R. and A.L. Buck, 1995: A High-Performance Hygrometer for Aircraft Use: Description, Installation, and Flight Data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 73-84.

Fimpel, H. P., 1987: The DFVLR meteorological research aircraft Falcon-E: Instrumentation and examples of measured data. Proc. 6th Symp. on Meteorol. Observ. and Instrum., AMS, Jan. 12-16, 1987, New Orleans, LA.

Fimpel, H. P., 1991: The DLR Meteorological Research Aircraft FALCON. In: U. Schumann and K.-P. Hoinka (Eds.): Contributions to Atmospheric Physics in Honor of Dr. Manfred Reinhardt to his 65th Birthday, DLR-Forschungsbericht DLR-FB 91-30, 207-213.

Meischner, P., (Ed.), 1985: Nutzerhandbuch für das FALCON-System. DFVLR Mitteilung 85-08, 131 pp.

Quante, M., R. Baumann, P.R.A. Brown, R. Busen and B. Guillemet, 1993: Three-Aircraft Intercomparison of Wind- and Turbulence Measurements during the 'Pre-EUCREX' Campaign. Proc. 8th Symp. on Meteorol. Observ. and Instrum., AMS, Jan. 17-22, 1993, Anaheim, CA.

Quante, M., P.R.A. Brown, R. Baumann, B. Guillemet and P. Hignett, 1995: Three-Aircraft Intercomparison of Dynamical and Thermodynamical Measurements During the Pre-EUCREX Campaign. Contrib. Atmos. Phys., in press.

Ström, J. R. Busen, M. Quante, B. Guillemet, P.R.A. Brown and J. Heintzenberg, 1994: Pre-EUCREX intercomparison of airborne humidity-measuring instruments. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 1392-1399.


Corresponding author's address:

Robert Baumann
Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre
DLR Oberpfaffenhofen
82234 Wessling
Germany
email:
robert.baumann@dlr.de

Falcon